From: GBurch1@aol.com
Date: Tue Nov 21 2000 - 16:14:55 MST
In a message dated 11/12/00 11:33:54 AM Central Standard Time,
sentience@pobox.com quoted somebody:
> > Houston, TX, does not have zoning laws, so there's no implied property
> > rights.
The first part of this is true (a fact I'm quite proud of as a Houstonian),
but I don't think the second part is true under any interpretation. Real
property in the city exists within a web of interlocking covenants that "run
with the land" and property owners must carry on their activities within the
limits of common and statutory law.
Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
ICQ # 61112550
"We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
-- Desmond Morris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:32:03 MST