From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 23:49:49 MDT
At 01:51 AM 7/10/00 -0700, Daniel Ust wrote:
>since we know Mach is wrong, the conclusion does not follow.
Oh. Good.
What *is* the origin of inertia, then? [Any mention of zero-point EM fields
earns instant disqualification]
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:31:27 MST