Peering into the ozone hole

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 14:00:12 MDT

• Next message: Brian Atkins: "Re: Pointless Re: Eugene's nuclear threat"
• Previous message: Jeff Davis: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
• In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Eugene's nuclear threat"
• Next in thread: Dan Fabulich: "Intelligence increase was: Eugene's nuclear threat"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Peering into the ozone hole

"If you ask, 'How low is (the ozone hole) going to get?' Well, we don't know
either. Every year we just have to watch it and see what happens," McPeters
said.
"But in the long term, we have quite a bit of confidence in the models at this
point," he said. "In the long term, it has to get better."

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast02oct_1.htm?list76937

• Next message: Brian Atkins: "Re: Pointless Re: Eugene's nuclear threat"
• Previous message: Jeff Davis: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
• In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Eugene's nuclear threat"
• Next in thread: Dan Fabulich: "Intelligence increase was: Eugene's nuclear threat"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:31:20 MST