Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?

From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 03:54:53 MDT

• Next message: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
• Previous message: KPJ: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
• In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
• Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
• Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

J. R. Molloy writes:
> That's right. Fundies will try whatever they can to win their unholy war against
> reason and science. The most responsible thing for science to do is to breed SI
> (thereby precipitating TS) as soon as possible.

Hmm, lemme see:

Good:

        Eugene Leitl (of course I am, what did *you* think)
        Mitchell Porter
        Anders Sandberg
        Alfred E. Neumann
        The Little Engine That Could
        Winnie the Pooh
        etc.

Evil:

        Eliezer Yudkowski
        J.R. Molloy
        Magneto
        The Grinch
        The Critters
        The Evil Choo Choo Train
        The Wicked Witch of the West
        etc.

It's sure nice to be able to live in such an orderly universe.

• Next message: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
• Previous message: KPJ: "Re: Why would AI want to be friendly?"
• In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
• Reply: Spike Jones: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
• Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Why wouldn't friendly AI leave fundies in the dust?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:31:20 MST