From: Brian D Williams (talon57@well.com)
Date: Mon Sep 11 2000 - 09:14:44 MDT
From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <retroman@turbont.net>
>How about corn that has a venus flytrap grown where the tassle
>is.....
I like it!
>Resistance to drought is not difficult, but there is a limit to
>the range of hydration any plant can tolerate. What would be nice
>is corn and wheat that has more resilience to their stalks, so
>they can be blown down by wind, hail, severe rain, without
>permanent damage. Since the weather system seems to be thrashing
>a bit more today than usual, hardiness like this would be
>important at keeping up yields.
Deeper roots might help the drought tolerance, along with having a
less permeable skin. Being shorter might help with wind resistance.
Having "hairy" leaves and stems helps resist insects. Selecting
(even in the test tube) for enhanced nutrition is also a big plus.
>Now, Bt corn does not need to be harmful to butterflies. The only
>reason why it is is because conventional field layouts do not
>allow for large gaps between Bt corn and milkweed between fields.
>This obviously mandates that fields get bigger and irrigation
>systems be larger, so the field margin that is planted with non-Bt
>corn is large enough to allow milkweed to not receive large
>quantities of Bt pollen.
True, but by reducing the overall population of milkweed you will
decrease the overall population of Monarchs. I would be hesitant
about eating anything that is killing insects.
Brian
Member:
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Mars Society, www.marssociety.org
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:54 MST