From: Dana Hedberg (dhedberg@courtlink.com)
Date: Mon Aug 21 2000 - 17:18:55 MDT
Possibly beating a dead horse:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/a/AP-Butterflies-Corn.html
[Reprinted, because you need a member subscription]
Study: Biotech Corn Kills Monarch
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Genetically engineered corn designed to kill an insect
pest spreads enough of its pollen on nearby weeds to kill monarch
butterflies, researchers said Monday in the latest study on the biotech
crop's environmental effects.
Iowa State University scientists found that one in five monarch larvae died
after being exposed to the toxic corn pollen for two days. Three days after
the initial two-day exposure more than half of the larvae died.
``In the field you may have higher mortality rates because of the cumulative
effect of being exposed to the toxin throughout the larval stage,'' said
researcher John Obrycki, whose study appears in the Internet edition of the
journal Oecologia. ``Coming up with a good ecological assessment of this
technology probably needed to be done before planting it across the
Midwest.''
The biotech corn, known as Bt corn for a bacterium gene that makes it toxic
to the European corn borer, became controversial last year after a
laboratory study at Cornell University showed it was toxic to monarch
butterflies.
The corn's pollen coats the leaves of nearby milkweed plants that butterfly
caterpillars eat.
The Cornell finding produced a public outcry in Europe and calls from
environmental groups to curb the spread of gene-altered crops, but biotech
supporters have criticized that study and the one from Iowa State for being
unrealistic.
``Much of what (the Iowa State study) reports is based on analyses taking
place in laboratory manipulations rather than field conditions,'' said Val
Giddings, vice president of food and agriculture for the Biotechnology
Industry Organization.
The Iowa State researchers planted breeds of biotech corn that produced
different levels of the insecticide pollen along with some corn that hadn't
been engineered. They then placed potted milkweed plants at varying
distances from the fields. After two or three days they took the milkweed
plants into the lab and exposed the butterflies to the plant leaves.
Significant numbers of butterflies died after exposure to leaves coated with
pollen, while those placed with leaves that were washed or unexposed to the
Bt pollen died at a normal rate.
Giddings said butterfly caterpillars are unlikely to encounter the pollen in
nature in any great numbers and that the monarch butterfly population
increased almost as much as the plantings of Bt corn last year.
An estimated 19 percent of the 80 million acres of corn growing this year
was Bt.
Environmental groups have petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to
have farmers surround fields of Bt corn with buffer zones of conventional
corn to prevent the pollen from spreading to milkweed.
``Continued inaction would clearly be lethal to monarch butterflies,'' said
Rebecca Goldburg, a scientist at Environmental Defense, a group critical of
genetically engineered crops.
The EPA has been reviewing its standard for biotech crops and plans to
release recommendations in September, said Steve Johnson, deputy assistant
administrator of the office of prevention, pesticides and toxic substances.
Early this year the EPA put new planting restrictions on Bt corn to prevent
insects from developing resistance to the toxin. The restrictions require
farmers to plant at least 20 percent conventional corn in most regions, and
50 percent in areas where cotton is grown.
In June, University of Illinois scientists placed black swallowtail
butterflies near a farmer's field and found no evidence that they were
harmed by the biotech corn. The swallowtail is considered less sensitive to
the corn toxin than the monarch, but is more likely to be exposed to the
pollen.
************************************
Can anyone point me to where this "research" is being published? I'd like to
actually see the methodology. Specifically, what does "exposure" mean?
-Dana
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:33 MST