From: Franklin Wayne Poley (culturex@vcn.bc.ca)
Date: Wed Aug 16 2000 - 13:59:32 MDT
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Michael S. Lorrey wrote:
> Please. Not from 1947. If the japanese had that kind of technology in 1947 we
> either wouldhave known about it at that point, or would have lost the war to
> them. Alien encounters, so far as we can currently tell, are merely the product
> of hypnogogic trances induced by chemical or electrical imbalances, as
> Persinger's research with electric fields shows. If the level of alien
> abductions are as high as proponents claim, there would be a fleet of at least
> 1000 such ufo's at a base on earth over the last 40 years, and at least one
> crash every year. Such a fleet would require a resident population of a minimum
> of 100,000 aliens to support with C3I, maintenance, and logistics support, and
> this is also assuming that they don't have the same need for resources that we
> do, that they do, in fact, have some sort of nanosanta technology. If they don't
> have this then their logistical problems on increase from there.
>
> Most of the alien BS you see is merely disinformation to cover for military R&D,
That's what I'm trying to elaborate on...that these phenomena, to the
extent that they are real, are military secret projects.
BTW is that URL below correct? I couldn't link to it.
FWP
> while some 'abduction' phenomena with material evidence may be evidence of
> either government or corporate illegal experimentation on humans (since we know
> the Energy Department has admitted to conducting such research for many years,
> this is not out of the bounds of possiblity, not nearly as far as alien
> abduction).
>
> Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Max More wrote:
> >
> > > Not great, but an interesting look at the thinking of several people. It
> > > gets more interesting in the second half. ExI Advisor Marvin Minsky is
> > > quoted on parallel evolution of intelligence:
> > >
> > > http://www.msnbc.com/news/446603.asp?0nm=T15N
> > >
> > > Max
> >
> > The Controversial Colonel Corso in his book, "The Day After Roswell" has
> > one complete chapter on the prospect that the allegedly captured aliens
> > from Roswell were robots of a sort. I have to see that as something worth
> > considering but with a different spin. If the "products of measured
> > intelligence" can all be matched or exceeded by robots today using the
> > state-of-the-art technology (as I conclude in the Epilogue of "Machine
> > Psychology") then military intelligence cannot afford to ignore
> > this. Black Projects must be dealing with this in some way right now
> > because the prospect then exists of a robotic military intelligence centre
> > having robots working tirelessly 24 hours a day on advancing military
> > science and those robots are more intelligent than competing human
> > military scientists, as defined above. No military worth its salt can
> > afford to ignore the possibility of an enemy having such an installation.
> > Theoretically, Japan for example could race centuries past the US with a
> > hidden installation no bigger than a box car. And those "aliens" could
> > then be advanced robots from centres such as this.
> > FWP
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Machine Psychology: http://www.atoma.f2s.com/atomareport.html (file #10)
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine Psychology: http://www.atoma.f2s.com/atomareport.html (file #10)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:29 MST