RE: Differing views of oil reserves

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Tue Aug 08 2000 - 10:11:40 MDT

• Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: worth a laugh"
• Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: R: Tipler disputes quantum nonlocality"
• Maybe in reply to: altamira: "RE: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Next in thread: altamira: "RE: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Reply: altamira: "RE: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Another matter is the continued development of non-petroleum based transportation fuels, unless you folks believe that Dr. Thomas Gold may be correct that the oils are geophysical in nature and is not bio-organic, in its inception?

• Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: worth a laugh"
• Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: R: Tipler disputes quantum nonlocality"
• Maybe in reply to: altamira: "RE: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Next in thread: altamira: "RE: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Reply: altamira: "RE: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Differing views of oil reserves"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:21 MST