From: phil osborn (philosborn@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Aug 05 2000 - 23:50:35 MDT
>From: Paul Hughes <paul@planetp.cc>
>Subject: Re: Obsolesence of Intellectual Property
>Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 00:32:02 -0700
>
>Jason Joel Thompson wrote:
>
> > Uh, actually this argument fails to sway because it defines theft in
>very
> > simplistic terms. You might not be stealing my music if you copy it,
>but
> > you certainly are stealing my profit. If you desire something that I
>have
> > spent energy producing, then it is clear that we should come to some
> > arrangement by which I should end up with something that you have spent
> > energy producing (like, er, money for instance.)
Actually, it just occurred to me that I get about as much enjoyment at the
spa where I work out from watching all the hot female hard bodies in action
as I do from music - perhaps more. Perhaps I should be paying them a
royalty? They certainly put a lot of work into getting to the point that I
can enjoy the sight of them, and it was probably done at least partially for
the purpose of creating that reaction in the right man.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:20 MST