From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@turbont.net)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 20:39:08 MDT
Eugene Leitl wrote:
>
> Michael S. Lorrey writes:
>
> > Ah, but is it unadvertised? I'll bet there are clauses in the user agreement that
> > specifically grant RealNetworks the right to do this. If its not, I'd rather see a
> > class action than legislation. Laws should be passed only when civil litigation fails
> > to redress a wrong.
>
> They're thinking about including the rights to the user's firstborn in
> the fine print, in their next player version. Since the luser chose
> not to read it, it's gotta be legal, right?
Failure to read the fine print does not excuse you from the contract.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:55 MST