From: Robert Bradbury (bradbury@genebee.msu.su)
Date: Mon Apr 17 2000 - 09:23:07 MDT
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Technotranscendence wrote:
> On Saturday, I wrote:
> > > > [snip], so I can't presume to understand the scope of storing the
> > > > engineering drawings for the most complex machine ever built to that
> > > > date, [snip]
> >
> > Is this really still true? How many parts were actually in a Saturn 5?
> > I would have to think that much of a Saturn 5 is nothing but big hunks
> > of sheet metal, fuel tanks and some plumbing. Size does not equal
> > complexity.
>
> Michael Lorrey did write "to that date" -- not to date.:)
>
Point taken, reading to quickly methinks... Thanks Daniel, Sorry Mike.
The question about measuring complexity still stands though...
R.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:28:03 MST