test

From: Michael S. Lorrey (mike@datamann.com)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:20:55 MDT

• Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in 2050)"
• Previous message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in2050)"
• In reply to: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: those NRA Australian statistics examined"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This is a test. I'm not receiving anything from the list, and the last message I
sent last night got rejected...

Mike Lorrey

• Next message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in 2050)"
• Previous message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Nanotech Restrictions (differences with haves and have-nots in2050)"
• In reply to: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: those NRA Australian statistics examined"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:57 MST