Re: Consciousness: Too much philosophy, not enough science

From: Ken Clements (Ken@Innovation-On-Demand.com)
Date: Tue Feb 29 2000 - 17:34:19 MST

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: See you there!"
Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Orbital Towers."
In reply to: Joseph Sterlynne: "RE: Consciousness: Too much philosophy, not enough science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Joseph Sterlynne wrote:

> <snip> In the literature [zombie] is used to refer to a theoretical
> entity which, ...

Who you callin 'theoretical', Bud?

See: http://www.lucifer.com/exi-lists/extropians.4Q99/3725.html
and: http://www.lucifer.com/exi-lists/extropians.4Q99/3928.html

-Ken

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: See you there!"
Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Orbital Towers."
In reply to: Joseph Sterlynne: "RE: Consciousness: Too much philosophy, not enough science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:06 MST