From: Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@turbont.net)
Date: Fri Feb 25 2000 - 12:39:41 MST
QueeneMUSE@aol.com wrote:
> WAIT WAIT WAIT!!
> Mike:
> I think I am onto something!
> You are saying that you have worked hard to possess logical, hard
> intelligence, and it's no f**gin' damn fun! You and many others POSSESS this
> trait, and others don't!
> They haven't worked for intelligence, these mental process comes NATCHERAL,
> like "feelings" -- so they can't claim it.
Not at all.
> OK, and you are pissed because lately other people are saying that they don't
> value your hard earned logic MORE than other kind of mental activities, such
> as musical abilities, creativity, physical grace, humor, sensory aesthetics
> -- all pure poppycock!!!
I didn't say that either. The goal of the soft science liberals is to denigrate
the value of intelligence, by establishing the meme that its no different than
plain emotion or any of the other human abilities that some regard as detrimental
to human advancement (like the need to procreate. That must be a Reproductive
Intelligence!! ;) )
> IF a mental process is fun, sexy AND sensuous, it cant POSSIBLY be real.
> (No matter how much work it takes to get there = ).
Not at all. I find intelligent women sexy, so since I equate intelligece with
sexy, what you say is not so.
> Must be only for new-agers and damn artists... not real men...
> (except most artists use Macs, not me though, I'm PC all the way)
Then there is hope for you yet. ;)
Mike Lorrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:01 MST