Re: ENERGY

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 23:48:52 MST


Yes it Does, at least appear feasible, and yet its really un-persued as a
primary energy source. But then again, to me, gradual improvements of the
old science of electrolysis seems plausible, for hydrogen production, yet
again, its a non-starter. Nitinol was kind of pimped by CNN many years ago,
but its no energy source. Maglich is or was a physicist working with
bombarding the nucleii of Lithium and Boron with extra protons for what he
termed 'aneutronic' energy. In any case nothing ever happended with it.

In a message dated 02/25/2000 1:14:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,
EvMick@aol.com writes:

> I've been following it for years...to me (a non technical type)....it seems
> feasable....but I imagine there is a lot of difference between being
> technically feasible and economically feasible..



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:01 MST