Re: 3-star system mechanics

From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Wed Feb 23 2000 - 20:05:40 MST


Tim Ventura wrote:

> I'd bet that based on the assumed requirements for an M-class star,

OK but why assume M class? They could be M, or O,B,A,F,G,K,
whatever you want, and in any mixture. With this, you could have
planets cooking or freezing or anything in between.

> The mechanics are so complicated ... that you end up with the self-defining system.

Doesnt hafta be. Imagine a simple case such as a 5 solar mass star,
orbitted by a 1 solar mass star out about where Mars is and a .2 SM
star out where Jupiter is. Now, out in Pluto's neighborhood you could
have a modest climate with a stable orbit, and out 5 times farther
than that you could have a freezing planet with a circular orbit. In
close to the 5 SM star you could have a broiling hot planet with
a stable orbit.

Actually, theres no need to strain tired imaginations. There are
simulations available cheap that one could use to demonstrate this
notion. spike



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:00 MST