Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun...

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Wed Feb 09 2000 - 22:45:27 MST

Next message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Freedom of shape (was: thermal poultry)"
Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Maybe in reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Next in thread: KPJ: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Reply: KPJ: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 2/9/2000 5:18:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,
bradbury@aeiveos.wa.com writes:

<<
a) We are genetically pre-wired for a concept of "beauty". >>

I have heard this argument in detail and I find it lacking
Sorry you dont like blondes

Next message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Freedom of shape (was: thermal poultry)"
Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Maybe in reply to: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Next in thread: KPJ: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Reply: KPJ: "Re: Hot Chicks: (ws) body mods making life more fun..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:26:43 MST