From lloyd.fourn at gmail.com  Thu Sep 21 01:44:47 2023
From: lloyd.fourn at gmail.com (Lloyd Fournier)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 11:44:47 +1000
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Practical PTLCs, a little more concretely
In-Reply-To: <ZQmUQYA2rUQI5zmQ@erisian.com.au>
References: <CAB3F3Dtp96RVZ8fqm4HoxyrigyOZRdW6gw3eJSvahUspr+eFng@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZQmUQYA2rUQI5zmQ@erisian.com.au>
Message-ID: <CAH5Bsr3hiihtJ0HCKLBNJB--XjYHHQA=gP9=e-=iOZ58atRkTA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi AJ,

On Wed, 20 Sept 2023 at 17:19, Anthony Towns <aj at erisian.com.au> wrote:

>
> I think:
>
>   https://github.com/BlockstreamResearch/scriptless-scripts/pull/24
>
> describes (w/ proof sketch) how to do a single-signer adaptor with musig2;
> might need some updates, to match the final musig2 API, but I think it's
> fundamentally okay: ie, you get the "single-sig adaptor" approach, but
> can just use the musig2 api, so best of both worlds.
>
>
 Can you explain the distinction here? What is a MuSig2 adaptor signature
vs single-singer adaptor with MuSig2.

Cheers,

LL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20230921/12b5ba25/attachment.html>