From clara.shikhelman at gmail.com  Fri Mar  3 16:14:12 2023
From: clara.shikhelman at gmail.com (Clara Shikhelman)
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:14:12 -0500
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Local Reputation to Mitigate Slow Jamming
In-Reply-To: <CA+n-rRv3302=WdT1r5aw6ajcpPm8G+ni1G842Gt+q_4v2tsANQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFi0HOdjm5VpX4OyUS8iWPm4uq6Qb-5WZDZ_p=JaaAF8S6Rtaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+n-rRs9Qn9mG5a8kpDMJgD69+LYVKfsRqAZ+OEvvE8AL3r+KA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACtNmG6s5w5hXCwzy_djL9c4v=Xjh976jWFe4Oc0500Rj0mFgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+n-rRv3302=WdT1r5aw6ajcpPm8G+ni1G842Gt+q_4v2tsANQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACtNmG5PVYa2nZGBJUUYyYkAt5enKyWVU0xE3NKkM=i=w_bktg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for the example.

- If c < p then yes it gives it a higher reputation but the reputation is
> capped at 1 anyway, so by underestimating the confidence the node doesn't
> gain anything.
>
Is there anything to gain from giving high confidence? By doing this, you
risk lowering your reputation, and it's not clear what you gain.
Could it be that the best selfish strategy is to report confidence 0 (that
maps to reputation 1) all the time?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20230303/ca1a5168/attachment.html>