From james at au92.org Tue Dec 5 00:19:41 2023 From: james at au92.org (James O'Beirne) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 19:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Mailing List Future In-Reply-To: References: <5458e0a9-ddd5-4ea1-8ebb-6151a3b20022@mattcorallo.com> Message-ID: <05CA43AE-9752-41DF-8BD8-1B693DB6A848@au92.org> Please see https://github.com/jamesob/delving-bitcoin-archive, which anyone can run an instance of themselves. On December 4, 2023 3:48:59 PM EST, Peter Todd wrote: >On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:35:32PM -0800, Matt Corallo wrote: >> Ah, there was also some concern over archiving of a discourse, which we'd >> hoped was trivial through "mailing list mode", but apparently that may not >> be the case. Further thoughts on that are welcome. > >You mean archiving of discourse on delvingbitcoin.org? > >I think that's a serious problem if there's no good way to mirror >delvingbitcoin.org. It is very easy to archive email lists, and anyone can do >it (I'm archiving lightning-dev, bitcoin-dev myself, among others). Also, email >list archives naturally lead themselves to decent authentication, both via PGP >and more commonly, DMIK, making archives authenticatable. I don't see any way >that delvingbitcoin.org could ever replicate that beyond mere timestamps. > >I'll be the first to say that timestamping is pretty weak security. Better than >nothing. But they aren't good. > >-- >https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: