From damian at willtech.com.au  Sun Feb 20 14:14:01 2022
From: damian at willtech.com.au (damian at willtech.com.au)
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 01:14:01 +1100
Subject: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev]   [Pre-BIP] Fee Accounts
In-Reply-To: <kJWi5A4sc0UEU4JrtSg3gbR_M1UTp15XW3Oj5B5cQZQvygFn9pIqrxVxCU0sFjG5L05fqDFH6nz2PnU0sE_zVNMGsCXzmtJeDAc1kEYmYKA=@protonmail.com>
References: <CAD5xwhik6jVQpP2_ss7d5o+pPLsqDCHuaXG41AMKHVYhZMXF1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <YgS3sJvg6kG3WnVJ@petertodd.org>
 <CAD5xwhi3Ja8gdU2h_6-1ck4kdU0TiC2Kx5O-61=f9=6JQSMs=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <YhAwr7+9mGJAe2/p@petertodd.org>
 <CAD5xwhi=sKckFZew75tZTogoeFABraWtJ6qMC+RgZjcirxYyZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <YhC6yjoe3bAfBS+W@petertodd.org>
 <kJWi5A4sc0UEU4JrtSg3gbR_M1UTp15XW3Oj5B5cQZQvygFn9pIqrxVxCU0sFjG5L05fqDFH6nz2PnU0sE_zVNMGsCXzmtJeDAc1kEYmYKA=@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <590cf52920040c9cf7517b219624bbb5@willtech.com.au>

Agreed, you cannot rely on a replacement transaction would somehow 
invalidate a previous version of it, it has been spoken into the gossip 
and exists there in mempools somewhere if it does, there is no guarantee 
that anyone has ever heard of the replacement transaction as there is no 
consensus about either the previous version of the transaction or its 
replacement until one of them is mined and the block accepted. -DA.

On 2022-02-20 04:20, darosior via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Necromancing might be a reasonable name for attacks that work by 
>> getting an
>> out-of-date version of a tx mined.
> 
> It's not an "attack"? There is no such thing as an out-of-date 
> transaction, if
> you signed and broadcasted it in the first place. You can't rely on
> the fact that
> a replacement transaction would somehow invalidate a previous version 
> of it.