From dan.gershony at gmail.com Fri Jul 2 12:02:28 2021 From: dan.gershony at gmail.com (Dan Gershony) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 13:02:28 +0100 Subject: [Lightning-dev] bLIPs: A proposal for community-driven app layer and protocol extension stand In-Reply-To: <2Q0B97XGHB0JK.26NR7TWXZV5BD@dalliard.ch> References: <2Q0B97XGHB0JK.26NR7TWXZV5BD@dalliard.ch> Message-ID: Hi, There will be many layer 2 (and probably layer 3) protocols (BOLT, RGB, Volts etc...) does it really make sense to merge them all into the BIPs system? On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 10:03 AM nathanael via Lightning-dev < lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Michael Folkson wrote: > > > Adding a third BIP editor more involved with Lightning sounds like a > good idea. > > > > Or alternatively if BOLTs were subsumed into BIPs I think Bastien > > would be a great additional BIP editor to cover Lightning related BIPs > > :) I think BOLTs being subsumed into BIPs would be nice but I'm > > pessimistic it will happen. Like legislation and regulation in the > > legacy financial system alphabet soups only expand they never get > > simplified. Let's at least resist alphabet soup expansion here. > > arent lightning improvements in the end bitcoin improvements too? > i am thinking of bips like the rfcs of the internet > > -- > nathanael > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: