From pete at petertodd.org Thu Dec 9 10:07:37 2021 From: pete at petertodd.org (Peter Todd) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 05:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] Sending OP_RETURN via Bitcoin Lightning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:49:11AM +0000, Christian Moss wrote: > pete at petertodd.org, so single use seals require an onchain transaction to > post the proof of publication to the ledger (assuming bitcoin is used as > the ledger) when an asset is transferred, but it can scale because you can > batch many proofs (transfer of ownerships) into a merkle tree and just add > the merkle root into the single tx going into the ledger? Exactly. And since the aggregation is trustless with respect to validity, users can choose what kind of censorship risk they're willing to take (as well as mitigate it with "multisig" schemes that use multiple aggregators in parallel). -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: