From lf-lists at mattcorallo.com  Mon Apr 26 15:08:18 2021
From: lf-lists at mattcorallo.com (Matt Corallo)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:08:18 -0400
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Increase channel-jamming capital requirements
 by not counting dust HTLCs
In-Reply-To: <CALkdYjWBCaC43mXUVVUepwnX1mZA1CZ+PY7WoNEO=WvR+JX7Jg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACdvm3M+rZ-0FCm_LcQdbw_G4dqmua6Urmmq0AsY9vhKNDQs9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <6475DCEE-4D7C-47B3-8B2E-8339009300AE@mattcorallo.com>
 <CACdvm3P0vA3QekDUOAK6Enqnuzgie8J1ckfpiv--tVWuk9Aq1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACdvm3OrwzakpsU4ZzU2_JA_y_P5Aeg4gpVR5tA+QCZhV8o27Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALkdYjWBCaC43mXUVVUepwnX1mZA1CZ+PY7WoNEO=WvR+JX7Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b336faf7-88ad-42bf-8fcb-aca039425654@mattcorallo.com>

> I looked into this more closely, and as far as I understand it, the spec
already states that you should not count dust HTLCs:

Oops! We do the same thing, we will fix that.

On 4/26/21 11:03, Eugene Siegel wrote:
> I would have to think more about the issue where it's not possible to lower the feerate though.? That seems 
> like a spec issue?

There is no current in-protocol way to change the dust limit, so the issue doesn't apply here.