From elzeigel at gmail.com  Mon Apr 26 15:03:15 2021
From: elzeigel at gmail.com (Eugene Siegel)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:03:15 -0400
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Increase channel-jamming capital requirements
 by not counting dust HTLCs
In-Reply-To: <CACdvm3OrwzakpsU4ZzU2_JA_y_P5Aeg4gpVR5tA+QCZhV8o27Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACdvm3M+rZ-0FCm_LcQdbw_G4dqmua6Urmmq0AsY9vhKNDQs9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <6475DCEE-4D7C-47B3-8B2E-8339009300AE@mattcorallo.com>
 <CACdvm3P0vA3QekDUOAK6Enqnuzgie8J1ckfpiv--tVWuk9Aq1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACdvm3OrwzakpsU4ZzU2_JA_y_P5Aeg4gpVR5tA+QCZhV8o27Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALkdYjWBCaC43mXUVVUepwnX1mZA1CZ+PY7WoNEO=WvR+JX7Jg@mail.gmail.com>

Lnd counts dust + trimmed HTLCs towards max_accepted_htlcs.  We definitely
shouldn't be counting dust towards that amount.  I would have to think more
about the issue where it's not possible to lower the feerate though.  That
seems like a spec issue?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20210426/cf896556/attachment.html>