From ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com  Thu Mar 14 07:55:20 2019
From: ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com (ZmnSCPxj)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:55:20 +0000
Subject: [Lightning-dev] More thoughts on NOINPUT safety
In-Reply-To: <20190314072456.br2leoiae6zs2jv2@erisian.com.au>
References: <20190313014143.ifffshwdux2jt7w5@erisian.com.au>
	<gs0Aizmvb8U11-Uz4RUqrEwgu00deU3JRhwHWbPjn8g1lZV3iaydqoYP3tldfrflHRC2HHJEZtAOVeYdaOW-chMcRdPVSiNYmqT6jSPnL1c=@protonmail.com>
	<20190313111050.qj3s6utpl2x34sam@erisian.com.au>
	<Au1N1itlfJk5MRV-KoKfmL9BgOGBW1Pdq9vRr-PBVVJfpRngTmpuTmbF5wCAkBSsUvMt3maA3e-VVr-WDDdwh2-XVeCOLjxVsOxABm7cfpU=@protonmail.com>
	<20190314072456.br2leoiae6zs2jv2@erisian.com.au>
Message-ID: <O3d59i9D9IDjRmjyV6mhBohniqOQfgf5zTl_Rw0NQ50oKbV8CRCqAdtyfMqMB4RpaEXJR0OSjBd2RsJv3rIpwkY5yxC1nXvY6QVhOluSuG0=@protonmail.com>

Good morning aj,

>
> Trying to maximise privacy there has the disadvantage that you have to
> do a new signature for every in-flight HTLC every time you update the
> state, which could be a lot of signatures for very active channels.

If I remember accurately this is already true for current Poon-Dryja channels in BOLT 1.0, so at least it is not a degradation of performance.
It does make this modified form of Decker-Russell-Osuntokun much less attractive for use with DLC as the Fulgurite effort would like, but the Fulgurite effort already mitigates this by splitting a channel into two sub-channels (one for high-activity LN payments, one for rare-activity DLC bets) anyway.

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj