From pm+lists at acinq.fr  Sun Nov 11 03:40:16 2018
From: pm+lists at acinq.fr (Pierre)
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 06:40:16 +0300
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Towards a Market for Liquidity Providers --
 Enforcing Minimum Channel Lifetime
In-Reply-To: <-dAuhZrJt_eORhmTFurLSV8FOuJnZBp2wrh_R8K9Q3BTEsNr0A851vS5lZP4voNCGtmzZwdwuWOH6RbTVg9pimsLdvtOS_zqjxp1RiHz6sc=@protonmail.com>
References: <-dAuhZrJt_eORhmTFurLSV8FOuJnZBp2wrh_R8K9Q3BTEsNr0A851vS5lZP4voNCGtmzZwdwuWOH6RbTVg9pimsLdvtOS_zqjxp1RiHz6sc=@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMXsxZM+_FOH=+=kGz7w0QyXascm_--fJh4Zvv5xZoYL=LqbGw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello ZmnSCPxj,

Thus, after Symmetric CSV, we could also add an additional CLTV constraint
> that determines the minimum channel lifetime.
>

I'm nitpicking, but parties have to exchange the first commitment txes (one
for each side) *before* the funding tx is even published. As a consequence,
the absolute CLTV delay wouldn't really constrain the duration of the
channel, because the timer starts running before the channel is created. Do
you think that matters?

Cheers,

Pierre
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20181111/3a22bc1a/attachment.html>