From decker.christian at gmail.com  Thu May  3 10:28:53 2018
From: decker.christian at gmail.com (Christian Decker)
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 12:28:53 +0200
Subject: [Lightning-dev] eltoo: A Simplified update Mechanism for
	Lightning and Off-Chain Contracts
In-Reply-To: <S_u-McN_skPfmgXsS71-iIshSAnVrcSEov3nSh3kP3KNaPw-iZhWGD2KzIb3-g3mH_HkNzD-n8VgfFiFvr1EJQ6ESrFGH4EgFaXQLF7lSy8=@protonmail.com>
References: <874ljsitvx.fsf@gmail.com>
	<h7nb3BUAECxyhOpzVdN07v9Sn7FT9RB4N0MtaWtXX_D2Q45wnng_qROtQFRJKS-lq0ktg4TjUdipb0Dtwxl-I5QgSQYOV5Jm2tUe3Bpfgx8=@protonmail.com>
	<87o9hzh998.fsf@gmail.com>
	<3IDeWyELpEhyqG2APyykQePqp7WPx99_U0aAKe9c4JAfjaV7WSsru1lnOUodf_sd225hWNjHk5Toib59MPLdBk_zb-P0TL9ume3GL7r2eYM=@protonmail.com>
	<S_u-McN_skPfmgXsS71-iIshSAnVrcSEov3nSh3kP3KNaPw-iZhWGD2KzIb3-g3mH_HkNzD-n8VgfFiFvr1EJQ6ESrFGH4EgFaXQLF7lSy8=@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <871setghi2.fsf@gmail.com>

ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com> writes:
> Ha, no, looking at the detailed `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` spec, `hashPrevouts`, which normally commits to the other inputs, is blanked, so we do not commit to them either.  This means that `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` implicitly has a `SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY`.
>
> (the BIP `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` in the eltoo pdf does not mention `hashSequence`, but it seems you managed to add that to your github BIP repository)

Yeah, Russell O'Connor pointed that difference out and I saw no point in
committing to the hashSequence, so I amended both the paper and the
BIP. The paper will get updated in a few days with the typos people have
found, but I thought that the BIP discussion was more urgent to keep up
to date, so I pushed that directly :-)