From greg at xiph.org  Tue Jul  3 23:45:22 2018
From: greg at xiph.org (Gregory Maxwell)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:45:22 +0000
Subject: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] BIP sighash_noinput
In-Reply-To: <20180703052100.gtjdverh5irfokrp@petertodd.org>
References: <871sewirni.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgS-_D7aBcDf_nAbuREBxv65zYMr60-1YqCnx-esvRVfEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87y3esvrvu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<20180703052100.gtjdverh5irfokrp@petertodd.org>
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTUHFpzW54A2_johHVfa=bwdo3CpG2or5Z1Qg4hC-B+rA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> The problem with that name is `SIGHASH_REUSE_VULNERABLE` tells you nothing
> about what the flag actually does.

I believe that making the signature replayable is 1:1 with omitting
the identification of the specific coin being spent from it.