From jb55 at jb55.com  Tue Jul  3 11:54:37 2018
From: jb55 at jb55.com (William Casarin)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 04:54:37 -0700
Subject: [Lightning-dev] [bitcoin-dev] BIP sighash_noinput
In-Reply-To: <pCP9Z6Iqp1vNfzs3qzRfN-kML2XCjrI5jZXVaWB7-Mf7GBg6rSDpbn5q9RMa8cr5InLZl1uwIuXOM30mJk_2u8gVz3W-UyPiXMQnSXg188w=@protonmail.com>
References: <871sewirni.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh73fe4h.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAHUJnBCBp2kPh+4_XmrX==b8t0zFTydWYHiJQzVbVApkbeCC8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<pCP9Z6Iqp1vNfzs3qzRfN-kML2XCjrI5jZXVaWB7-Mf7GBg6rSDpbn5q9RMa8cr5InLZl1uwIuXOM30mJk_2u8gVz3W-UyPiXMQnSXg188w=@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <b0c84fce-27a0-4380-a16f-d06d941990f9@jb55.com>

A convention in Haskell libraries is to use an "unsafe" prefix to any function that may have side effects (here be dragons, etc)

I'm happy with a _VULNERABLE or _UNSAFE postfix as a standard way to signal this.