From cezary.dziemian at gmail.com Thu Jan 11 17:16:31 2018 From: cezary.dziemian at gmail.com (Cezary Dziemian) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:16:31 +0100 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Invoice without amount In-Reply-To: <CAO3Pvs-xmF-oyW9K_A-fSnTcUVA6RP858RuG45PaMZnRrfDpqQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFDmaN76qiGHqFspZ6R8FN7eEsGCaFBKyFiTMni4sHs7512v0w@mail.gmail.com> <G6ytGZcDsaKz_S5gofEQORzYPcgBTthX38ScHfyBnMIt4cdGFiNCZAsL4LdI9xF_F5ZeIyxBL1ZzXfWdBsROfNvYGehoJU_SaFNS92Oca5o=@protonmail.com> <87incbtzzu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <CAFDmaN4-DwnU1wDQie5UdHvZ8iN9KrDfq3r2ffUhvXfFZ8Zx2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAO3Pvs-xmF-oyW9K_A-fSnTcUVA6RP858RuG45PaMZnRrfDpqQ@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <CAFDmaN6nyi=VGTUtkYsiakBKRp-w6QBL1iyL30Z8XVfbQWFJhg@mail.gmail.com> I made issue 5 days ago: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/564 2018-01-11 0:21 GMT+01:00 Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32 at gmail.com>: > > Hi Cezary, > > I invite you to make an issue on lnd's issue tracker: https://github.com/ > lightningnetwork/lnd/issues. This list isn't the place for support > requests/features for individual implementations. > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:21 AM Cezary Dziemian <cezary.dziemian at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Good news, thanks. >> >> Do Lightning Labs also have plan to introduce this soon? I prefer to stay >> with lnd, as we already know this implementation better, but if this option >> will not be introduced soon, we have to switch to use c-lightning. >> >> Cheers, >> Cezary >> >> 2018-01-09 5:31 GMT+01:00 Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>: >> >>> ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev <lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> >>> writes: >>> >>> > Good morning Cezary, >>> > >>> > Currently, c-lightning can PAY amountless invoices via the "pay" >>> command, but cannot CREATE them via the c-lightning "invoice" command. >>> >>> Good point, I've filed an issue for this, so we don't lose it: >>> >>> https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/534 >>> >>> > To pay an amountless invoice lntb... 4 satoshis in c-lightning: >>> lightning-cli pay lntb.. 4000 >>> >>> Note that I'd prefer the "msatoshi" field to be a magic string >>> (eg. "any") rather than omitting the parameter, since it's too easy for >>> a bug to omit the parameter. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Rusty. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lightning-dev mailing list >> Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20180111/c3982401/attachment.html>