From rusty at rustcorp.com.au Sun Dec 2 22:48:04 2018 From: rusty at rustcorp.com.au (Rusty Russell) Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 09:18:04 +1030 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Base AMP In-Reply-To: References: <87k1l6nivn.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <87zhtuvznz.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <_E9BzXjIxAU_qilMgT2Obfkvjc0gSMKzSBnvXp_Au4n-sJRVStA_f7C6BsCw2FHHiH6CfACfGTYG-DwUlOCHgBMM0tAspgpWbsswgQI6l14=@protonmail.com> <87zhtrh2gn.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: <87in0bfsuz.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> ZmnSCPxj writes: > But what if 2 of those paths fail? > It would be better to merge them into a single payment along the expensive 4th path. > However, the remaining succeeding path has already given `numpaths`=3. > > Using `numpaths` overcommits to what you will do in the future, and is unnecessary anyway. > The payee is interested in the total value, not the details of the split. Excellent point. Thanks, Rusty.