From ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com Fri Apr 20 03:43:30 2018 From: ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com (ZmnSCPxj) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 23:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Proposal for Advertising Lightning nodes via DNS records. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good morning Tyler, Offhand, I am uncertain the first script given in "Technical Proposal" works as a "check proof-of-work" script. Are the "[]" comments? Or are they pushes of actual data embedded in the SCRIPT? It seems to be comments...? OP_CheckLockTimeVerify is absolute time, not relative time. Why blockheight 52560 in particular? I believe this was in 2010? Or are you thinking OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY which imposes a relative timelock? Locking funds for a time may be enough without pulling in proof-of-work, especially since the Bitcoin blockchain itself is already proof-of-work. See my half-baked ideas for proof-of-mainstake, where locking funds in the mainchain is used as voting rights for correctness of the sidechain, avoiding normal proof-of-stake problems since the stake that backs the chain is on a separate proof-of-work chain. Regards, ZmnSCPxj -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: