From tier.nolan at gmail.com  Wed Feb  8 11:35:31 2017
From: tier.nolan at gmail.com (Tier Nolan)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:35:31 +0000
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Anchor transaction for no expiration channels
 without segwit
In-Reply-To: <CA+1nnrnpZpXk9W+LUsNkTyvQ-b25kQ2_gQgW6vm+-3kCb2QK5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrkUXTo6y1jPL4EN-NjreDs2Jpg7nk77sePPdLM0UJXkPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE-z3OV+ATf5FSZUnR_qg5XNjZMOo+tWHTD8b5LHtYGbifA61w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+1nnrkb7WEBPgc3N4ZRCcY=bqh0y_MGa7QTrMhOSSGNMXibQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE-z3OXWMc+HccrNsKiK0ftKzTmbncFSSUnez_FUST4o3iFTog@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+1nnrm=nAY9NHn06_nG6rx=rSwVc6Rf4Ce92k2gkziDKn-s=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+1nnrn_HFyvymvB9Dy7+6beVU08uDe+3rMgsRYcbqQFDbN8eA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE-z3OVpjjjsmSFw2Ldou=i1rnG3=Wwt=6trAcfStpULH8bteQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+1nnrnpZpXk9W+LUsNkTyvQ-b25kQ2_gQgW6vm+-3kCb2QK5A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OW2jvwQwyNVL6Xdiu2OaObpBU5m5mzhgVj7aJdwk2D_zQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier at gmail.com>
wrote:

> The locktime is basically useless.
>

It solves the problem at (almost) zero cost.  The disadvantage is that it
sets a minimum delay for a forced channel close, but using CSV also does
that, and is slightly larger.

Having a way to cooperatively reclaim the deposit is a good idea.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20170208/94b23981/attachment.html>