From tier.nolan at gmail.com Mon Feb 6 20:02:03 2017 From: tier.nolan at gmail.com (Tier Nolan) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:02:03 +0000 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Anchor transaction for no expiration channels without segwit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Nicolas Dorier wrote: > I think you do not need the second timeout. > > TX2 would be signed by Bob only once he could get back the second Output > of TX1. > Alice must have a fully signed version of TX2 before the timeout finishes. If she doesn't, then Bob can reclaim TX1/1 once the timeout expires and then refuse to sign TX2. If Alice has a signed version of TX2, then she can broadcast it and immediately close the channel (claiming TX1/0). Once that has been accepted, she can then claim TX1/1. > So Bob does not have to worry about Alice closing the channel with TX2. > > Nicolas, > > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: