From rusty at rustcorp.com.au  Mon Oct 24 03:59:10 2016
From: rusty at rustcorp.com.au (Rusty Russell)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:29:10 +1030
Subject: [Lightning-dev] [BOLT Draft] Onion Routing Spec
In-Reply-To: <CAO3Pvs8hzNicDryzS0K2Cg5ACx+f0p2mdPXckLzmrhQQ0xk55w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160819183647.GB15105@lightning.network>
	<87pop1df71.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CAO3Pvs8B=ymN3o37QnMg5DexmNPJkVp6Md24qeetkL06h6dQMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160902120822.GA4575@nex> <87y4376q25.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<20160906112701.GA28919@nex> <87k2eo7b3g.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CAO3Pvs_WugO6CRMxHPZJ7QtaiTTb=1EFpBrbzKk_BbP8+=-nKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8760piglkv.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CAO3Pvs8B0A5qu7GYVu8=uTYnd+miyuROM+RHz5Vt5Hd70-ce9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20161003213457.GA9571@nex>
	<CALxbBHX9cg2fycBuw_btPz0WDCzfS7ViwkXVNs7LKdd9szepFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO3Pvs8hzNicDryzS0K2Cg5ACx+f0p2mdPXckLzmrhQQ0xk55w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87bmyaqtwx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32 at gmail.com> writes:
>> I kept the shared secret backlog for now, since committing the routing
>> information to the payment hash is awkward
>
> When we agreed to include the payment hash in the MAC check within the
> header, I assumed that the packet format wouldn't be modified to include the
> payment hash (either in the header or e2e payload).

Yep, that was my understanding too.

Thanks!
Rusty.