From rusty at rustcorp.com.au Mon Oct 24 03:59:10 2016 From: rusty at rustcorp.com.au (Rusty Russell) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:29:10 +1030 Subject: [Lightning-dev] [BOLT Draft] Onion Routing Spec In-Reply-To: <CAO3Pvs8hzNicDryzS0K2Cg5ACx+f0p2mdPXckLzmrhQQ0xk55w@mail.gmail.com> References: <20160819183647.GB15105@lightning.network> <87pop1df71.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <CAO3Pvs8B=ymN3o37QnMg5DexmNPJkVp6Md24qeetkL06h6dQMw@mail.gmail.com> <20160902120822.GA4575@nex> <87y4376q25.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20160906112701.GA28919@nex> <87k2eo7b3g.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <CAO3Pvs_WugO6CRMxHPZJ7QtaiTTb=1EFpBrbzKk_BbP8+=-nKA@mail.gmail.com> <8760piglkv.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <CAO3Pvs8B0A5qu7GYVu8=uTYnd+miyuROM+RHz5Vt5Hd70-ce9w@mail.gmail.com> <20161003213457.GA9571@nex> <CALxbBHX9cg2fycBuw_btPz0WDCzfS7ViwkXVNs7LKdd9szepFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO3Pvs8hzNicDryzS0K2Cg5ACx+f0p2mdPXckLzmrhQQ0xk55w@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <87bmyaqtwx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Olaoluwa Osuntokun <laolu32 at gmail.com> writes: >> I kept the shared secret backlog for now, since committing the routing >> information to the payment hash is awkward > > When we agreed to include the payment hash in the MAC check within the > header, I assumed that the packet format wouldn't be modified to include the > payment hash (either in the header or e2e payload). Yep, that was my understanding too. Thanks! Rusty.