From pm+lists at acinq.fr  Wed May 18 17:46:44 2016
From: pm+lists at acinq.fr (Pierre)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:46:44 +0200
Subject: [Lightning-dev] BOLT #2: wire protocol: YA acknowledgement
	change.
In-Reply-To: <87k2itnoxu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <87k2itnoxu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Message-ID: <CAMXsxZPEpBBfFhSuF-uaHK8Xcd0M4Bxk0D-2NRYWpvD8aWrvVw@mail.gmail.com>

I like it! Let's hope it will suit everyone and we can converge on
something soon.

FWIW I was able to independently implement a toy version of the
protocol and pass your scripted tests [*] so I guess there are no
obvious issues (duh). Maybe it could be the first step towards a LN
nonreg test set?

Just one thing about the "nocommitwait", I wonder why you make it
optional in your test: why would you forbid the sending of two
successive commits, given that the more permissive approach is
perfectly well defined?

Cheers,
Pierre

PS: what does YA mean?

[*] For those interested:
https://gist.github.com/pm47/0c87329dbc5d43d35857e5ba3a20400c