From martijn.meijering at mevs.nl  Tue Mar  8 19:21:24 2016
From: martijn.meijering at mevs.nl (Martijn Meijering)
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:21:24 +0100
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Simplifying revocation through a new opcode for
	general signature verification?
Message-ID: <CAODYVYcnNTD2sKsVFpMz5f2y2JJZ8dPLdijdPkhL18h2bLBDBQ@mail.gmail.com>

Now that we almost have SegWit and its soft fork mechanism for upgrading
the scripting system, wouldn't it be a good idea to introduce a new opcode
for signature verification for arbitrary but appropriately
length-restricted messages? Instead of maintaining mirror images of txs and
going through the dance of revealing hash preimages, wouldn't it be easier
to to sign a message that revokes a previous balance (with hash + sequence
number)? Am I overlooking anything? This looks like a simple new opcode
that could substantially simplify the LN protocol.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20160308/cdec7da8/attachment-0001.html>