From mats at blockchain.com  Tue Mar  8 15:53:04 2016
From: mats at blockchain.com (Mats Jerratsch)
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:53:04 +0000
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Backward deterministic R Value
In-Reply-To: <CA+1nnrkf6aaeU6JBVQSWXYf8jEEGmarcpxwOVGVKNyxjQcwg-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrkjr=_1BeTh+QrWbyxwyc+i+AgGSh4EmM6z-kpvJ6eJ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87d1r5ooev.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CA+1nnr=fkYAPiy=8Y6CKZFUjJ7ShvBPQ-4ssCSWFtyNAh8Ru6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1457421588.1640.3.camel@ultimatestunts.nl>
	<56DEECD9.9060202@blockchain.com>
	<CA+1nnrkf6aaeU6JBVQSWXYf8jEEGmarcpxwOVGVKNyxjQcwg-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56DEF560.8080908@blockchain.com>

I'm not saying they close the channel. Alice could want to receive more
money and accept other payments, but not a particular one. But by doing
so, she would automatically disclose R for any old payment.

Am 08/03/2016 um 15:51 schrieb Nicolas Dorier:
> I'm not sure what you mean Alice don't have to disclose R if she does
> not want to.

-- 
Mats Jerratsch
Backend Engineer, Blockchain
e: mats at blockchain.com
PGP: https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7F3EC6CA

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20160308/14ff2555/attachment-0001.sig>