From pm+lists at acinq.fr Mon Sep 14 21:44:26 2015 From: pm+lists at acinq.fr (Pierre) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:44:26 +0200 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Atomic swap In-Reply-To: <87613cltzh.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <87613cltzh.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: > Caveats: > 1) We still need some way of adding another anchor to a channel, since > the atomic swap can't increase channel *capacity*. Yes. I think updating channel capacity is maybe less important for now, but that's just my opinion. > 2) This is a routing question :) Huh ? > So, they're normal HTLCs, but the "next hop" is not "lightning node X" > but "bitcoin address X". Riiiight ! Awesome -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: