From elombrozo at gmail.com Thu Jul 30 06:38:50 2015 From: elombrozo at gmail.com (Eric Lombrozo) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:38:50 -0700 Subject: [Lightning-dev] OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY In-Reply-To: <87twsmo31o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <5B9604FB-B266-4EC8-81DE-3DC1C120F762@gmail.com> <87twsmo31o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: I?m not entirely clear on how you intended to use OP_CAT. I was thinking something along the lines of OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY OP_DROP - Eric > On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Eric Lombrozo writes: >> I don?t know if anyone has done any research or published anything in >> this regard, but one of the major issues with bitcoin I?ve been trying >> to solve is how to properly incentivize nodes to construct SPV proofs. > > This can almost be done via P2SH, but not quite: > > 1) OP_CAT is disabled :( > 2) The txlen limit might bite, I'd have to do the maths. > > Cheers, > Rusty. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: