From mark at friedenbach.org Sat Jul 18 15:46:15 2015 From: mark at friedenbach.org (Mark Friedenbach) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:46:15 -0700 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Lightning modifications draft paper In-Reply-To: References: <87mvyvci2k.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: BIP62 is not in any way abandoned. It just takes time to implement such broad changes and to be assured of their safety. BIP66 rushed a subset of features that were necessary to close we pretty serious vulnerabilities (details of that are forthcoming soon now that it has been deployed). On Jul 18, 2015 08:15, "Nick ODell" wrote: > I'm pretty sure that BIP62 is abandonded. At least, the PR based on it > was never merged. BIP66 implements some of it, and rules 2-7 have been > nonstandard for a while, but I don't think that rules 2-7 are enforced > against new blocks. > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Rusty Russell > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ln-deploy-draft-01.pdf > > > > I haven't had time to proofread this properly, nor check the > > script examples. But wanted to post it before the weekend so you all > > have something to chew on :) > > > > Cheers, > > Rusty. > > _______________________________________________ > > Lightning-dev mailing list > > Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: