From aj at erisian.com.au  Tue Dec  8 02:10:46 2015
From: aj at erisian.com.au (Anthony Towns)
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:10:46 +1000
Subject: [Lightning-dev] Better privacy with SNARKs
In-Reply-To: <CAODYVYdnGSSnP9suy5LqFgQ8YDG2=MndNU8jqDM6j-EtredAxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAODYVYdnGSSnP9suy5LqFgQ8YDG2=MndNU8jqDM6j-EtredAxw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20151208021046.GA32564@sapphire.erisian.com.au>

On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 05:24:54PM +0100, Martijn Meijering wrote:
> "So, it turns out that a SNARK is overkill for the application in this
> thread."
> Could you elaborate on this? Are the required messages too large, does
> verification take too long, something else?

Not so much that; matsjj found a way to get the same result using
the crypto we're already relying on (ie, just using ECC multiply and
addition).

Cheers,
aj