From btcdrak at gmail.com Wed Aug 19 11:03:07 2015 From: btcdrak at gmail.com (Btc Drak) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:03:07 +0100 Subject: [Lightning-dev] Pure No-Trust Solution using only OP_CLTV In-Reply-To: References: <87oaiak6iw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Btc Drak wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Rusty Russell > wrote: > > I am really hoping that OP_CSV gets deployed in time to avoid such a > > hack. There's plenty of work in the mean time! > > Sorry to gatecrash, but it would really help matters if those > interested in OP_CSV could review the OP_CSV BIP[1], the pull > request[2] and also the related BIP68 PR[3]. > > There will also be a BIP proposal for median-past-timelock shortly > which will need review. > > Lastly there is growing support for the idea of a feature-pack > softfork which includes CLTV+CSV+BIP68+median_past_timelock as a > single softfork so your thoughts about this deployment option would > also greatly contribute towards establishing consensus on how to move > forward. > > Regards, > > Drak > > [1] > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010198.html > [2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564 > [3] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6312 Gentlemen, The "median-past-locktime" pull requests are now available as well for review. I'm posting because it has direct relevance to Lightning as it forms part of the locktime featureset referenced above: BIP discussion: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010348.html Core pull request: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6566 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: