From elombrozo at gmail.com Sat Aug 1 11:04:58 2015 From: elombrozo at gmail.com (Eric Lombrozo) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 04:04:58 -0700 Subject: [Lightning-dev] OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY In-Reply-To: <877fpfnugf.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <5B9604FB-B266-4EC8-81DE-3DC1C120F762@gmail.com> <87twsmo31o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <877fpfnugf.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: <5E2D6F46-15BD-4549-BD30-43FEB2AC0451@gmail.com> > On Aug 1, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Eric Lombrozo writes: >> I?m not entirely clear on how you intended to use OP_CAT. > > You can open-code a merkle tree calculation using OP_CAT and OP_HASH256. > No need for a new OP (though that may be more efficient). Gotcha. > Anyway, I think we're getting off-topic for this list. AFAICT, this is > not lightning-specific. You?re right, this might not be the best place to discuss it - but I?m not sure where to discuss it since such an idea doesn?t make sense outside the context of a level 2 protocol. > Cheers, > Rusty. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: