[p2p-research] Commons Discussion in Dakar

[Michel Bauwens]

I added the intro,

I really can't add another mailing list and the archive of the dakar
discussion is unavailable for non-subscribers,

I wonder if someone could do some selective editing of interesting
contributions that could be added to the wiki?

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Silke Helfrich <Silke.Helfrich at gmx.de>wrote:

> Hi Michel,
>
> some more information on the context of Dakar (both Social Forum on
> Science and Democracy and WSF) can be found here,
> some additional questions as well.
>
> http://bienscommuns.org/blog/?p=1180
>
> Very best and thanks for creating the discussion page! VEry helpfull (I
> will at least attend 5 commons events in Dakar and also launch our
> commons report "Commons - Prosperity by Sharing" / "Prospérité par le
> partage"... so, a lot of opportunities to share the ideas discussed on
> the commoning list with a broader public.
>
> Very best
> Silke
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 11:22 +0700, Michel Bauwens wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I'm creating a page http://p2pfoundation.net/Commons_Debate_in_Dakar
> > to keep the more elaborated responses such as that of Brigitte,
> >
> > but feel free to post others if you feel they should be on to,
> >
> > the page would benefit from some intro paragraph, so thanks for
> > resending the contextual info on this debate, so outsiders can know
> > what it is about,
> >
> > I will respond later,
> >
> > Hilary, see the link, you may want to pitch in on the welfare state
> > question for example,
> >
> > Michel
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Stefan Meretz <stefan at meretz.de>
> > wrote:
> >         Dear Brigitte and all,
> >
> >         On 2010-12-27 19:30, Brigitte Kratzwald wrote:
> >         > This could mean what we called in Berlin to defend the
> >         essence of the
> >         > welfare state but not its form.
> >
> >
> >         What is the essence of the welfare state being independent of
> >         the form?
> >         (serious question, I have no idea)
> >
> >         > So in my opinion, enterprises can and must be commoners
> >
> >
> >         Enterprises? You mean entrepeneurs?
> >
> >         > But the enterprise itself cannot be a commons
> >
> >
> >         ... and also not be commoners, because they are not persons.
> >
> >         Best,
> >         Stefan
> >
> >         --
> >         Start here: www.meretz.de
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Commoning mailing list
> >         Commoning at lists.wissensallmende.de
> >         http://lists.wissensallmende.de/mailman/listinfo/commoning
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  -
> > http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
> >
> > Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
> > http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
> >
> > Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
> > http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
> >
> > Think tank:
> > http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Commoning mailing list
> > Commoning at lists.wissensallmende.de
> > http://lists.wissensallmende.de/mailman/listinfo/commoning
>
>
>


-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Think tank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20110104/e651ab4b/attachment.html>