[p2p-research] for those who missed it: important news about the future of the p2p foundation

[Michel Bauwens]

The next “five year plan” of the P2P Foundation: constructing livelihood
through phyles<http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-next-five-year-plan-of-the-p2p-foundation-constructing-livelihood-through-phyles/2010/11/24>
[image: photo of Michel Bauwens]
Michel Bauwens
24th November 2010

 *Towards a strategic relationship between the P2P Foundation and Las Indias
*

Regular readers of our blog will have noticed that I have paid substantial
attention to my discovery of the Spanish-language network developed by
lasindias.net, which I hadn’t previously encountered.
Las Indias, is a cooperative, a neomedieval ‘neo-Venetian’ guild structure
that was rooted in cyberpunk literature and is devoted to the globalization
of small entrepreneurs. As a entrepreneurial but fraternal structure, it
fully engages not only in providing its members with a current livelihood,
but with full future security. Las Indias fully adopts and practices the
open ethos, uses decision-making through deliberation, and is committed to
splitting into autonomous units, whenever the Dunbar limit is reached.

Recently, I covered the three books, recently translated, in which David de
Ugarte and others from lasindias.net, offer their take on the history of
economic forms (Phyles: Economic Democracy of the Network Age); a history of
governance forms (From Nations to Networks), and a history of civil society
itself (The Power of Networks). There are well-thought out interpretations
of where we are going and how networks are changing the fundamental nature
of our social organization.

The key insight for me is their argument for the creation of phyles. Indeed,
it was a missing piece of the puzzle in my own peer to peer theory. We have
been able to describe the emergence of peer production, governance, and
property; we have been able to describe the emergence of open business
models, mostly noticing how companies are adapting to communities. But at
the same time, we also know that there is not a clear choice available for
peer producers who want to go their own way. We have successfully
democratized the means of creating value, but have not been able to
democratize the means of realizing that value. Creating livelihood
independently of the capital players that profit from our social cooperation
and obtain asymmetrical hyper-competitivity through our contributions,
remains an arduous task. Localization through global open design communities
is still mostly an effort to avoid the dislocation of the global meltdown,
it’s a strategy of resilience, not yet of thrivability; and the nation state
is increasingly failing us, with what remains of the welfare state under a
violent assault of extreme neoliberalism. We create increasing surplus
value, but we don’t capture it, this is the crux of the matter.

Las Indias on the other hand, asks the right question, and in my opinion,
gives the right answer.

*The question is: what do distributed networks really bring to the table,
that is new and unique, and points the way forward?*

The answer: it is a new form of human socialization around the creation of
common value. Distributed networks do not just change localism and the
nation-state, but create the possibility of creating transnational value
networks, used by communities in order to sustain their common work. In
other words, we are not just talking about entrepreneurs and businesses
adapting to co-production and communities, BUT, we are talking about
communities creating their own mission-oriented business forms, in which the
market activity is subsumed to the common value. This creates sustainability
and livelihoods for the individuals involved; subsumes the profit
maximization of the marketplace to higher ethical values which constrain it
to the value commons; and captures the surplus value directly for the peer
producers.

There are a lot of exciting things to say about the internal organization of
the Las Indias phyle, which is a combination of elements of cooperatives,
decision through deliberation, the gradation of knowledge skills taken from
the guild system, etc … The reality is that, in a world where precarity is
the norm for many peer producers, the phyle is a efficacious solidarity
mechanism. Next to liberty and equality, it brings the missing fraternity to
the table of social practice, in a new transnational format that transcends
the limitations of the nation-state, and is rooted in a true human
community.
Therefore, it is now clear to me that the central task of the P2P
Foundation, after five years of creating a global knowledge commons in
conditions of precarity, is, for the next five years, to focus on the
sustainability of the common work, by creating appropriate livelihoods,
through the creation of a phyle.

The way I see it, we are going through a major cultural, political, economic
transition; nothing less than a revolution and phase transition; the P2P
Foundation wants to position itself as one of the trusted players that can
offer guidance and learning in this transformation, on both individual and
collective levels. The knowledge commons will continue to evolve and
improve, but an added layer of activity will offer useful services that can
generate income.

My visit last month, where I spent two days socializing with lasindias in
Madrid, showed that we are operating on the same wavelength, and that there
is strong mutual sympathy. Therefore, there is a priori agreement, which
still needs to be worked out in detail, to form a strategic relationship.
Lasindias will help us create a phyle, and we will help to spread the key
insight of phyles in the English-speaking world, while creating first-class
educational material to go through the transition period unscathed, coming
out with the thrivability associated with providing useful services to
society.

How exactly the P2P Foundation phyle will look, is still an open question,
as I do have anxieties and reservations about the full communal level that
is at the heart of Las Indias. Las Indias has a very strong ‘social market’
orientation, rather than our own commons’ orientation. So there are
differences, and their will remain a diversity in our cooperation. The way I
envision it, is the following: the peer to peer revolution is a deep
cultural, political, economic and social transformation, which will require
a very broad ‘church’ of interlinked social movements. Within this broad
movement, it is a very good thing that there is a very committed core, that
lives their values to the fullest, and serves an inspiration and an example
for others.

In terms of P2P Theory as a guide to transformation, a very important
missing piece of the puzzle has now been added. In the context of a failing
nation-state, destructive globalized capitalism, there does exist a social
form that is both local and global in form, and can provide security for its
peer producing members.


-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Think tank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20101125/2e1205bc/attachment.html>