[p2p-research] abundance economics book

Michel Bauwens michelsub2004 at gmail.com
Fri May 21 17:26:42 CEST 2010


I know it's related, but that is an absolutely crucial difference: you deny
any participation to the workers who actually produce the wealth, and it is
a solution I categoricallyr reject (unless freely chosen by consumer coops
etc.. as part of a larger pluralist economy)

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Patrick Anderson <agnucius at gmail.com>wrote:

> Samuel Rose wrote:
> > re-invest the profits into creating
> > more and more abundance-economy-based systems.
>
> Who will receive ownership of those new investments?
>
> I'm sure it must not be those who paid them, right?
>
>
> Michel Bauwens wrote:
> > Sam, what you write here strikes me as a great and
> > crucial strategic insight, actually a key to our progess,
>
> I've been suggesting the same thing for years!
>
> The only difference is that I also say it is the Payer that should own
> those new investments creating the
> http://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_feedback<http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_feedback>any stable system
> requires.
>



-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Think thank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20100521/5414f08d/attachment.html>


More information about the p2presearch mailing list