[p2p-research] Inquiry project: what's the relation to p2p

[Michel Bauwens]

Hi Jon,

I propose that you use the tag [[Category:Inquiry]],

and that you write some initial contexts about your motivations on that
category page,

I will then create a link next to the other projects already listed,

Michel

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Jon Awbrey <jawbrey at att.net> wrote:

> Hi Michel,
>
> Sorry about the formatting issues, as I'm just now
> getting back to your site and forgot the local prefs.
>
> The project on Peer Educational Resources (PERs) is my current try at
> addressing a host of problems that I've noticed with various projects
> on Open Educational Resources (OERs).  I don't know if it needs to be
> a category unto itself -- some people like lots of cats, others not --
> so whatever you think best.
>
> In connection with this idea, I envisioned a way organizing materials that
> uses the concepts of "Focal Nodes" and "Peer Nodes".  There is some hint of
> what I have in mind here on the two sub-projects Inquiry Live and Logic
> Live.
>
> I'll be trying to articulate a more detailed rationale on my talk page
> later on,
> but this is whole project is somewhat more experimental -- trying to break
> out
> of developmental ruts that I've observed over the last decade -- than
> thoroughly
> worked out ahead of time.
>
> Jon
>
>
> Michel Bauwens wrote:
>
>> Dear Jon,
>>
>> I have noticed  quite a bit of new entries in our wiki,
>>
>> I have a few remarks:
>>
>> 1) it is not obvious to me in what way this is related to p2p? If it is,
>> it needs explanation for our audience and it can find a place under the
>> personal projects at the right hand column
>>
>> 2) please use all caps for entries
>>
>> 3) please be extremely conservative with empthy links; people creating
>> empty
>> links have a poor record of filling them in later, and the multiple
>> clicking
>> on empty pages is hugely frustrating for a general audience, I got many
>> complains in the past about this
>>
>> 4) only create new categories which are understandable to the general
>> public
>> and that you effectively intend to use
>>
>> Sorry if this sounds negative, but I do think our wiki needs some boundary
>> conditions,
>>
>> Michel
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
> mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
> knol: http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/3fkwvf69kridz/1
> oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
>



-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Think thank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20100502/f0c6bdd8/attachment.html>