[p2p-research] the issue with forking

[Phoebe]

Hi Michel et al,

Good timing. I am presenting work on the same panel with Nathaniel at
Jussi's event this week in Cambridge (see URLs below).

*Thinking Network Politics: Methods, Epistemology, Process
*http://www.networkpolitics.org/
Schedule:
http://www.networkpolitics.org/content/thinking-network-politics-conference-schedule

Cheers,

Phoebe


On 22 March 2010 09:49, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com> wrote:

> the following seems an important issue for us,
>
> Phoebe/George, could you eventually explore this and fish for a deeper text
> by Nathaniel?
>
> Jussi will most like have the email contact,
>
> Michel
>
>
> http://www.networkpolitics.org/sites/default/files/netpol10v2%20abstracts.pdf
>
> *
>
> Nathaniel Tkacz: The Politics of Forking Paths
> *
>
> Open projects are defined by their forkability. So central is this capacity
> (to
>
> fork), software and other content projects cannot lay claim to the beloved
>
> notion of openness without it. While forking is variously celebrated or
>
> discouraged depending on a whole series of factors, all agree that the
> *potential*
>
> to fork is vital for what might be called the political legitimacy of open
>
> projects. That is, such projects might be full of conflicts, have
> domineering
>
> participants, too many or not enough rules, trolls, vandals, sock puppets
> and
>
> numerous other schemers and nasties, and yet in the last instance each
>
> participant must see the overall organisation of the project as acceptable
> and
>
> therefore legitimate. If this was not so, members are free to take the
> software
>
> or content from the existing project and continue in a new direction and
> with
>
> new governance.
>
> Rather than accept this widely held position, this presentation offers a
> critical
>
> reading of forking. I begin by dispelling the ideas that anyone can fork
> and
>
> that all – if any - projects are forkable. Using examples from the history
> of
>
> Wikipedia, I then argue that forking offers a window to the many
> asymmetries
>
> that characterise collaborative, P2P networks and the open projects created
> on
>
> them.
>
>
> --
> Work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University - Think
> thank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
>
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>
> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>
> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Employment profile: http://www.espach.salford.ac.uk/page/Phoebe_Moore

Manchester Film Cooperative: http://www.manchesterfilm.coop/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20100322/5137cf94/attachment.html>